HUD's Half Billion to Cal. Funds Local Gov't Purchase, Rehab of Foreclosed Homes
California to get $500 million in federal foreclosure relief
Within hours of the announcement, California's two Democratic U.S. senators, Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer, protested that the state was not getting its fair share of the nearly $4 billion Congress allocated to help local governments deal with blight from foreclosures.
HUD officials said they believe their formula fairly distributes money to the places that need it most. They also said the senators were using different, less complete data than HUD relied on; HUD data show that Florida has a higher foreclosure rate and a higher risk for abandoned homes than California.
The city of Los Angeles is to receive about $33 million directly from the federal government. In the next few months, the city could also get money from the state, which has a pool of $145 million to allocate to communities. With more than 13,000 foreclosed homes in the city, Los Angeles Councilman Ed Reyes warned that the federal funds would go quickly. Los Angeles County is to receive $17 million, and other cities in the county, such as Long Beach and Lancaster, also would get awards.
The largest single award, about $50 million, would go to Riverside County, where the foreclosure crisis is so dire that bobcats recently took up residence in an empty home.
HUD's neighborhood stabilization program, which was championed by U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Los Angeles), is part of a housing bill approved in July. It gives money directly to local governments to buy and fix up foreclosed homes.
Critics of the program say it could hurt recovery, explaining that governments will now be competing with lenders and private homeowners who have been struggling to sell in a depressed market.
Last month, The Times contacted housing officials in the 12 California counties with the highest concentrations of foreclosed properties. Most said they had not lobbied for the bill, and several wondered whether they had the staff to make use of the funding.
Under the program, governments can demolish or rehabilitate blighted homes, then either resell them or use them for affordable housing.
jessica.garrison [at] latimes [dot] com
Like what you see? Go ahead and show your support! UCAN is a truly independent non-profit watchdog organization, dependent on grassroots donations like yours!
Utility Consumers' Action Network
(619) 696-6966 or file a complaint about a company online.
Terms & Conditions
UCAN.org is made available by the Utility Consumers' Action Network to assist you in becoming what you always knew you could be, a consumer ROCK STAR! We take no corporate money, and are beholden only to you, the consumer. As such, the site is here for educational, advocacy, and empowerment purposes, as well to to give you general information and a general understanding of the law. Just remember this site is NOT here to provide specific legal advice. By using this web site you of course understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Web Site publisher, UCAN. The Web Site should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state.
That said, get to digging on the site, inform yourself, speak your mind, and earn Watchdog Bones! This is YOUR site, and we mean it. So comment on any of the content, discuss the latest issues in the forums, file a complaint on a company with the fraud squad, and generally cut loose.
See our Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy, Some Rights Reserved
- Remember, if you have any questions about copyright law or need legal information regarding intellectual property, the internet, or new technologies, visit our affiliate New Media Rights at www.newmediarights.org. If you are in the San Diego region, you can also can apply to use our multimedia studio and equipment for free.







Biggest Target of Politicians!
One of the biggest targets for politicians, as far as economics are concerned, is becoming the payday loans industry. Governors across the country are trying to rid their states of the industry altogether, and so far, Georgia, North Carolina, and Oregon have succeeded. The result was that bankruptcies, foreclosures, and also the number of overdraft fees due to bouncing checks went through the roof, which doesn’t do anything for the citizens afflicted in these turbulent times, and only is really good for the banking industry. Despite these negative effects, other states are looking to follow the example and do the same. Even at the national level, presidential candidate Barack Obama, is weighing in his own agenda on the issue, and advancing his own intentions on getting rid of the industry in the United States completely. If these measures, both on state levels and nationally, are successful, the results are going to be increased unemployment, more debt, more foreclosures, and an even worse economy.
Post new comment